The “Axial Age” is the notion that the
contemporary world has been shaped by an
"axial age" centering around the time period (800-200 BC), the time when
Western society was born and world religions spontaneously and independently
appeared out of a seemingly shared value set. It is most associated with
Karl Jaspers, with a time line of (800-200 BCE ),
which Jaspers called "the most crucial turning point in history; it was
then that man as he is today was born" (8). In this age, despite the
differences in the religions that emerged, humanity had a unifying goal of
self-transcendence.
This idea appears in Ian Morris’s well received tome: "Why
The West Rules- for Now.” Morris refers to an "Axial Age" (500
BC-100BC) which some scholars see as a period of ferment and change
in Europe, Asia and the "Middle East" with numerous parallel,
independent developments in human thought and philosophy. Thus Greece
"Over and over again, the triumphs of western culture
turn out to have been local versions of broader trends, not lonely beacons in a
general darkness and, if we think about culture in a broader, more
anthropological sense, the West's history again seems to be one example of a
larger pattern rather than a unique story."
This “Axial” notion is quite reasonable if
considered in a measured way. And it has some importance in terms of historical
accuracy and balance, for in certain quarters of the European academy some
still claim that the Greeks "invented" such things as "critical consciousness" or "reason" - as if other peoples
were not capable of such. The concept of the Axial Age raises a corrective
about many extreme, OVER-INFLATED Eurocentric claims not only in academia but outside as well. Popular
culture, including liberal culture, often embraces these over-inflated claims, as in
the end of the "Spartan" movie "300" – where Greek
"rationality" is touted over Persian "superstition" as if
the Persians were somehow incapable of rational thought, or organization. This is a movie from
liberal Hollywood
Another laughable attempt to create a "contrast"
(plus work in a gay subtext) is that the Persians are bestial "enemies of freedom" while the white Spartans fight for "freedom, "reason" and "justice." This is ludicrous even by Hollywood standards, but it is common, (and sometimes effective) propaganda. In reality the Spartans were brutal imperialists that themselves crushed "freedom" time and time again in Greece when it suited their own ends. One of the most laughable lines in the movie is "The world will know that free men stood against a tyrant." - this from the mouth of the depicted leader of one of the most tyrannical people in the ancient world- the Spartans, whose society was maintained by a form of slavery on the helots, who in addition to the "usual" abuses of violence and exploitation, could be killed with impunity. That little detail of course does not make it into the glorious propaganda narrative of "freedom." As one ancient Greek writer notes:
"They assign to the Helots every shameful task leading to disgrace. For they ordained that each one of them must wear a dogskin cap .. and wrap himself in skins and receive a stipulated number of beatings every year regardless of any wrongdoing, so that they would never forget they were slaves. Moreover, if any exceeded the vigour proper to a slave's condition, they made death the penalty; and they allotted a punishment to those controlling them if they failed."
-- Myron of Priene, Greek historian of the middle 3rd century BC (Apud Athenaeus, 14, 647d = FGH 106 F 2. Trans. by Cartledge, p.305.)
In fact the Spartans, at various parts in their history, negotiated with and collaborated with the Persians, sacrificing Greek "freedom" in order to maintain their hegemony in Greece. Their defeat by Persia and Persian-backed forces at Cnidus was cheered by several Greek cities, which expelled the Spartan garrisons and more gladly accepted less onerous Persian rule. Books such as Paul Cartledge's The Spartans: The World of the Warrior-Heroes of Ancient Greece- 2003, break down the credible historical detail, in sharp contrast to Hollywood nonsense.
As for the allegedly more "rational" Athenians- how did they make out on the "freedom" front? Turns out the Athenians were grasping, predatory imperialists as well. As one historian notes:
"The Athenians, seeing no contradiction between imperialism and democracy, also manipulated the league for their own economic advantage. They believed that their freedom and prosperity required subduing, exploiting, and enslaving others, and they adhered to the principle that strong states had a natural right to dominate weaker ones. They relished the empire that gave them wealth, power and glory. Moreover, the Athenians claimed that other city-states benefited from Athenian hegemony. Athens forbade member states to withdraw [from the Delian League], crushed revolts, and stationed garrisons on the territory of confederate states. It used both tribute from members and the league's treasury to finance public works in Athens.. As the Persian threat subsided, hatred for Athenian imperialism grew. In converting the Delian League into an instrument of Athenian imperialism, Athens may have lost an opportunity to perform a great creative act- forming a broad voluntary confederation that might have forestalled the intercity warfare that gravely weakened Hellenic civilization."
--Perry et al. 2009. Western Civilization: Ideas, Politics, and Society. p. 61
Throughout the "300" movie, the Persians are depicted as a beastly alien "other." Hollywood based the movie on graphic novelist Frank Miller's book of the same name. The film adaptation, with its bogus talk about "rationality" and "freedom" mirrors Miller's skewed writing on this score. Miller's solid artwork and text presents the 300 Spartans as hard but honest warriors, fighting for honor and duty, but he places a somewhat overdone "paragon of civilization" meme in the mouths of the Greeks at the end who say- "We rescue a world from the old, dark, stupid ways and we usher in a brighter future, that is surely brighter than we can imagine."
Exactly how the Athenians and Spartans, who both used slaves and were indeed glad to enslave others, and who indeed collaborated and allied with the Persians at various points deviated from "old, dark, stupid ways" is left unsaid, and perhaps rightly so- for the proposition is dubious. If anything, history depicts the "brighter future" as pretty much like the "dark past" with plenty of death, wars, destruction and slavery as far as the Greeks are concerned. Miller's book uses stereotypical, well-worn tropes unsubtle "messages" the movie parrots. However, unlike the Hollywood version- Miller does not demonize the Persians. They are- who they are - no more brutal than the Spartans- and his depiction of the Persian Immortals is not of bestial zombies, but elite fighting men who happen to wear distinctive masks. Hollywood's distortions casts a pall on what is otherwise an excellent action flick.
Per Hollywood, most of the emissaries of Persia - alleged "enemy of freedom" are depicted by black actors and they are almost all killed or maimed. One even rolls his lit-up eyes like the classic "darkie" menace as he bribes Greek traitors. Of course the same "alien" subtext could have been conveyed by "dusky" white actors; nevertheless use of blacks here is not necessarily a bad thing, and does speak to the multinational character of the Persian empire, and does spark more visual engagement as opposed to just another nondescript set of white actors with heavy suntan lotion. The main envoy is veteran Ghanaian-born British actor Peter Mensah- who has appeared in other well received ancient epic productions like "Spartacus" before and after, bringing a certain heft to the role. The filmmakers deserve credit, and some of the case might just be typical Hollywood "bending" history. But just maybe, there is another anti-"multicultural" subtext there too.. perfect fodder for post-911 propaganda tropes, and narratives of an "enemy" Other..
Anyway, liberal Hollywood's Persians use "bestial" half-men, half-beast, wild-looking creatures called "The Immortals" to fight the white heroes. Unlike Miller who presents them as simply a daring elite force, the movie depicts them as animalistic, zombie-like monstrosities with filed teeth, who use a helping of supernatural "darkness" on their side, including a rabid animal-like "berserker" type champion who has to be kept in chains before he is "unleashed" on the white Spartan heroes. The film's narrator calls the Immortals "soulless" - an interesting metaphor. Why would strongly implied non-white troops (even their face masks look 'negroid') be "soulless"? But in reality, the Immortals were an elite, well-equipped, sophisticated fighting force, not beast-men, and they lacked only in heavy armor and shields- which though had the upside of increasing their mobility. They served as the Imperial Guard as well as part of the central striking force or reserve. Even allowing for Hollywood hyperbole and distortion, the subtle message of the "racial other" -versus virtuous white people- is not hard to miss. Such distortion is not only confined to popular media, but can be seen in part, among some academics as well.
Miller's original depiction of Xerxes in his finery. An alien "gayness" about the Persian is emphasized as compared to allegedly more "virile" Spartans- who ironically, themselves the record shows, partook frequently in homosexual activity.
Persian leaders are also depicted as
somewhat effeminate and homosexual leaning. Persian King Xerxes for example shows up
with mincing, bejeweled delicacy including having his eyebrows “done” and slowly
massages the shoulders of heroic he-man Spartan Leonidas during a parley. Even his voice is "modulated" and his tall physical dimensions convey awkwardness. Frank Miller's original depiction also projects a "gayness" on the "dusky", bejeweled Persian king. The
"message" from both Miller's comic treatment and in the Hollywood version of course (among others) is to contrast "gay" Persia Sparta
But in reality, the Spartans themselves were deeply involved in "boy loving" and indulged in homosexual activity as part of their military culture. They were not the hetero "role models" touted by many. Indeed reputed white Spartan "role models" routinely indulged at hindquarters- from their system of pairing youths with older men for homosexual sex while training, to initiatory pederasty, to the common lesbian scenarios where older Spartan women exploited young girls for their pleasure. Indeed to illustrate just how "gay" the mighty Spartans were, it was not uncommon for brides to dress as young boys on their wedding nights- the "stimulas" perhaps moving their husbands to greater Spartan efforts in bed duty. As one scholar notes:
"They assign to the Helots every shameful task leading to disgrace. For they ordained that each one of them must wear a dogskin cap .. and wrap himself in skins and receive a stipulated number of beatings every year regardless of any wrongdoing, so that they would never forget they were slaves. Moreover, if any exceeded the vigour proper to a slave's condition, they made death the penalty; and they allotted a punishment to those controlling them if they failed."
-- Myron of Priene, Greek historian of the middle 3rd century BC (Apud Athenaeus, 14, 647d = FGH 106 F 2. Trans. by Cartledge, p.305.)
In fact the Spartans, at various parts in their history, negotiated with and collaborated with the Persians, sacrificing Greek "freedom" in order to maintain their hegemony in Greece. Their defeat by Persia and Persian-backed forces at Cnidus was cheered by several Greek cities, which expelled the Spartan garrisons and more gladly accepted less onerous Persian rule. Books such as Paul Cartledge's The Spartans: The World of the Warrior-Heroes of Ancient Greece- 2003, break down the credible historical detail, in sharp contrast to Hollywood nonsense.
As for the allegedly more "rational" Athenians- how did they make out on the "freedom" front? Turns out the Athenians were grasping, predatory imperialists as well. As one historian notes:
"The Athenians, seeing no contradiction between imperialism and democracy, also manipulated the league for their own economic advantage. They believed that their freedom and prosperity required subduing, exploiting, and enslaving others, and they adhered to the principle that strong states had a natural right to dominate weaker ones. They relished the empire that gave them wealth, power and glory. Moreover, the Athenians claimed that other city-states benefited from Athenian hegemony. Athens forbade member states to withdraw [from the Delian League], crushed revolts, and stationed garrisons on the territory of confederate states. It used both tribute from members and the league's treasury to finance public works in Athens.. As the Persian threat subsided, hatred for Athenian imperialism grew. In converting the Delian League into an instrument of Athenian imperialism, Athens may have lost an opportunity to perform a great creative act- forming a broad voluntary confederation that might have forestalled the intercity warfare that gravely weakened Hellenic civilization."
--Perry et al. 2009. Western Civilization: Ideas, Politics, and Society. p. 61
Throughout the "300" movie, the Persians are depicted as a beastly alien "other." Hollywood based the movie on graphic novelist Frank Miller's book of the same name. The film adaptation, with its bogus talk about "rationality" and "freedom" mirrors Miller's skewed writing on this score. Miller's solid artwork and text presents the 300 Spartans as hard but honest warriors, fighting for honor and duty, but he places a somewhat overdone "paragon of civilization" meme in the mouths of the Greeks at the end who say- "We rescue a world from the old, dark, stupid ways and we usher in a brighter future, that is surely brighter than we can imagine."
Exactly how the Athenians and Spartans, who both used slaves and were indeed glad to enslave others, and who indeed collaborated and allied with the Persians at various points deviated from "old, dark, stupid ways" is left unsaid, and perhaps rightly so- for the proposition is dubious. If anything, history depicts the "brighter future" as pretty much like the "dark past" with plenty of death, wars, destruction and slavery as far as the Greeks are concerned. Miller's book uses stereotypical, well-worn tropes unsubtle "messages" the movie parrots. However, unlike the Hollywood version- Miller does not demonize the Persians. They are- who they are - no more brutal than the Spartans- and his depiction of the Persian Immortals is not of bestial zombies, but elite fighting men who happen to wear distinctive masks. Hollywood's distortions casts a pall on what is otherwise an excellent action flick.
Per Hollywood, most of the emissaries of Persia - alleged "enemy of freedom" are depicted by black actors and they are almost all killed or maimed. One even rolls his lit-up eyes like the classic "darkie" menace as he bribes Greek traitors. Of course the same "alien" subtext could have been conveyed by "dusky" white actors; nevertheless use of blacks here is not necessarily a bad thing, and does speak to the multinational character of the Persian empire, and does spark more visual engagement as opposed to just another nondescript set of white actors with heavy suntan lotion. The main envoy is veteran Ghanaian-born British actor Peter Mensah- who has appeared in other well received ancient epic productions like "Spartacus" before and after, bringing a certain heft to the role. The filmmakers deserve credit, and some of the case might just be typical Hollywood "bending" history. But just maybe, there is another anti-"multicultural" subtext there too.. perfect fodder for post-911 propaganda tropes, and narratives of an "enemy" Other..
Anyway, liberal Hollywood's Persians use "bestial" half-men, half-beast, wild-looking creatures called "The Immortals" to fight the white heroes. Unlike Miller who presents them as simply a daring elite force, the movie depicts them as animalistic, zombie-like monstrosities with filed teeth, who use a helping of supernatural "darkness" on their side, including a rabid animal-like "berserker" type champion who has to be kept in chains before he is "unleashed" on the white Spartan heroes. The film's narrator calls the Immortals "soulless" - an interesting metaphor. Why would strongly implied non-white troops (even their face masks look 'negroid') be "soulless"? But in reality, the Immortals were an elite, well-equipped, sophisticated fighting force, not beast-men, and they lacked only in heavy armor and shields- which though had the upside of increasing their mobility. They served as the Imperial Guard as well as part of the central striking force or reserve. Even allowing for Hollywood hyperbole and distortion, the subtle message of the "racial other" -versus virtuous white people- is not hard to miss. Such distortion is not only confined to popular media, but can be seen in part, among some academics as well.
But in reality, the Spartans themselves were deeply involved in "boy loving" and indulged in homosexual activity as part of their military culture. They were not the hetero "role models" touted by many. Indeed reputed white Spartan "role models" routinely indulged at hindquarters- from their system of pairing youths with older men for homosexual sex while training, to initiatory pederasty, to the common lesbian scenarios where older Spartan women exploited young girls for their pleasure. Indeed to illustrate just how "gay" the mighty Spartans were, it was not uncommon for brides to dress as young boys on their wedding nights- the "stimulas" perhaps moving their husbands to greater Spartan efforts in bed duty. As one scholar notes:
"..young boys between the ages of 6 and 16 were
organized in 'packs' and 'herds' and placed under the supervision of young
adult Spartans. This supervision was sometimes seen as surrogate fathering and
one marker of its activity ".. was the institution of institutionalized
pederasty. After the age of twelve, each Spartan teenager was expected to
receive a young adult warrior as his lover."
--From: The Spartans: the world of the warrior-heroes of
ancient Greece, from utopia to crisis and collapse Paul Cartledge, 2003.pg
69-70
Back on the 'axial' track, some world history timelines do
show a period of upheaval and transformation across a huge part of the Old
World . The invention of zero and a binary number system took place
in India Asia and the Near East were in
ferment or on the march- demonstrating that the notion where everything
important came out of "the West" is dubious. "Reason" and
"philosophy" for example did not begin with the Greeks as popular
culture and academia would have us believe. In fact credible histories show the
Greeks borrowed liberally from elsewhere in a variety of areas, as would be
expected from a Mediterranean trading culture. This does not at all deny their
own distinctive LOCAL ARTICULATION of certain universal human concerns, or of their
own subsequent innovations, angles and developments.
The notion of the Axial Age also reinforces the fact that "the West" is the beneficiary of numerous things and concepts invented elsewhere that are crucial to "civilization" - a point readily acknowledged by pro-Western historians-See Morris 2010 for example, or the magisterial work of Joseph Needham on ancient Chinese technology, or works on the Islamic civilizations, or Pomeranz et al (the Great Divergence 2000). Writing for example was not developed in "the West", nor were the primary key plant and animal domesticates that feed and clothe the most of the world at the present time.
Numerous other technologies can be named- from key types of geared, powered, pre-steam machinery, to printing, to gunpowder, etc. Indeed
In the realm of geometrical astronomy for example, credible studies show that peoples of the Middle East were using sophisticated methods to calculate planetary orbits such as that of Jupiter, as early as 350BC, over a thousand years before similar calculations were accurately done in Europe. This again shows the broad sweep of knowledge in the non-European zone - and debunks simplistic claims seeing Greece as the fount of all wisdom, or knowledge. To the contrary, the Greeks borrowed heavily from other cultures of North Africa and the Middle East. See: Joel Achenbach. 2016. Clay tablets reveal Babylonians discovered astronomical geometry 1,400 years before Europeans. Washington Post January 28, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/01/28/clay-tablets-reveal-babylonians-invented-astronomical-geometry-1400-years-before-europeans/
Then there is the question of practicality: As far as Greek technology for example, one scholar notes, that except for a few things like siege equipment and certain weapons, it was woefully short on practical, real world application, though long on theoretical talk, and gimmicks like distorting mirrors or theater automata.
"These technical treatises exhibit one remarkable characteristic: they include little or nothing concerning the most vital basic techniques- nothing about roofing, pottery, textiles, or agricultural work. The texts frequently describe apparatuses without any practical, everyday use: automata for theater, complex toys, gear systems that are probably unworkable and entirely theoretical, distorting mirrors for the amusement of princesses, stills for a chimerical transmutation of metals. The only apparatuses of any real importance in these texts are war machines: assault engines, tortoise-shell shields, watchtowers, mines and catapults."
--From: The Greek pursuit of knowledge. 2003 - Page 40
"Yet it remained true that Greek technology, however you measure its achievement, never explored and applied more than a small fraction of what Greek science might have made possible. It did not run machines, relieve labor of its burdens, increase man's productive capacity greatly, build a powerful industrial civilization. Why.. the heart of the matter is less in the failure of science to develop fully than in its failure to make the transition to technology. The thinking of the Greeks was done by free men and citizens; the work was done by foreigners and slaves.."
---Science, technology, and society 1997
Axiomatic curves?
Whether the ferment circa 600-200BC was an "Age of
Transformation" in the more EXTREME sense is questionable. There were
certain commonalities of forces, networks of trade, contacts, migrations, and
the rise of various large-scale empires as in the Near East or Asia .
Certainly very broad trends were afoot, and cultures interacting did produce
partial syntheses, or at least some borrowings or exchanges all over the place,
but to squeeze them into an all-defining mass called "Axial" distorts
the distinctive developments in local cultures. I also think some go overboard with EXTREME or inflated "axial
transformation" approaches- as a "revolutionary" departure in human thought- such as
self-reflection. QUOTE FROM ONE APPROACH:
[i]Before a certain time, some psychologists believe,
ancient peoples also differed from us by exhibiting far less capacity to
monitor their internal thoughts, feelings, and motives; they engaged in little
or no self-reflection, and lacked a personal identity other than a name,
parentage, and a recollection of a sequence of life events.
...a strange veil
seems to lie over the most ancient cultures...as though man had not yet really
come to himself...".
Below is a horizontal timeline extending from 2000 BCE
to 2000 CE (today). Crossing it
vertically is an "Axis of Change" positioned at 550 BCE .
This axis, according to Jaspers, divided earlier peoples from those who more
closely resemble the peoples of today.
Around that axis is an era -- from about 800 BCE
to 200 BCE -- designated as the "Axial
Age" or "the Great Transformation."
People who lived on the early side of the axis, some
scholars believe, lacked much self-reflection and lacked the concepts, ideas,
and thoughts related to such awareness. People who lived on the later side of
the axis were essentially contemporary in those aspects of their psychology.”
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-personality-analyst/200905/the-significance-the-axial-age-the-great-transformation
^^I question those who claim that self-reflection is such a
revolutionary insertion during the Axial Age time period. Prominent Axial
proponent Karen Armstrong for example claims:
"The Axial Age’s empathy rested on a new, and brutal,
type of human awareness. “The Axial sages all pointed out that existence was
inherently unsatisfactory and painful, and wanted to transcend this
suffering... salvation lay in facing up to suffering, not retreating into
denial… This facing up involves another Axial principle, kenosis, the notion of
emptying the self of ego and pride."
Really now.. all that? What else we missing- love? sex? rock
and roll? Again looking at Egypt Egypt, they brought part of the "axial ferment" circa 600 BC to that region, Persian empire ,
numerous ideas and concepts were cross-fertilized across huge parts of Eurasia . Fair enough. Certainly as other scholars show Greece was also heavily influenced by Persia and the whole Middle Eastern region via trade, technology, religion and cross-fertilization of ideas.
ButEgypt
In fact, the detailed exposition of Professor Jan Assmann (Jan Assmann. 2008. Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel and the Rise of Monotheism. pp 76-90) shows that Egypt had "axiality" in loads, much of it influenced by the trauma caused by political, military and economic upheaval. Where old institutions and assumptions declined, new patterns assumed prominence- including the critical reflective changes in religion, i.e. the Judgment of the dead, and the development of Personal Piety. Ancient Egypt also played a clear part in the development of monotheism, having of course its own variant. Hence its peoples were not "static" or "unchanging" and did not need mystical "incoming Caucasoids" to spark changes in reaction to internal upheavals and troubles- which existed long before any "newcomers." Indeed there are antecedents of changes and shifts centuries prior within Egyptian tradition and history. Critical reflection and analysis at a distance is thus not something "invented" by Greeks, as some would have have it. Says Assmann:
But
In fact, the detailed exposition of Professor Jan Assmann (Jan Assmann. 2008. Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel and the Rise of Monotheism. pp 76-90) shows that Egypt had "axiality" in loads, much of it influenced by the trauma caused by political, military and economic upheaval. Where old institutions and assumptions declined, new patterns assumed prominence- including the critical reflective changes in religion, i.e. the Judgment of the dead, and the development of Personal Piety. Ancient Egypt also played a clear part in the development of monotheism, having of course its own variant. Hence its peoples were not "static" or "unchanging" and did not need mystical "incoming Caucasoids" to spark changes in reaction to internal upheavals and troubles- which existed long before any "newcomers." Indeed there are antecedents of changes and shifts centuries prior within Egyptian tradition and history. Critical reflection and analysis at a distance is thus not something "invented" by Greeks, as some would have have it. Says Assmann:
"However, what Voegelin was unable to see and what only Egyptology is able to bring to light is that this axial breakthrough had forerunners or foreshadowings in Egyptian history, a fact that profoundly affects the chronological implications of the Axial Age theory. These forerunners may be explained historically by breakdowns and disappointments in the political sphere, historical experiences of a rather traumatic character. The ancient Egyptian evidence invites us to modify the Axial Age theory in two respects that are of some importance in our general search for the roots of monotheism. One is the differentiation of the all-too-compact notion of an “Axial Age” into a gamut of smaller-scale transformations or into different degrees of “axiality.” Another is the possibility—and even necessity—of integrating those transformations into a larger context of historical changes and experiences. According to this theory, the separation of state and religion, or Herrschaft und Heil (Sovereignty and Salvation), has been forced upon some peoples— especially those who adopted the name “Israel”—by historical events of a traumatic nature...
During this period of anxiety and reorientation, the Egyptians put the verdict of posterity on a more stable basis in the form of a divine judgment at the court of Osiris. This is the first instance of the transposition of an idea or institution from the earthly sphere involving the social and the political to the transcendent sphere of the divine, which is the hallmark of “axiality.”
The Rise of Personal Piety... represents the most conspicuous case of such a transposition in Egyptian religious history. It concerns the rise and the final breakthrough of a religious trend Egyptologists call “Personal Piety.”11 The language of these texts has a long history.14 Many expressions can be traced back to the First Intermediate Period (2150–2000 BCE), where they describe the relationship of patron and client. During the Middle Kingdom (2000–1750 BCE) the ruling dynasty adopted this formula, together with its rhetoric, as a model for the new relationship between king and official, based on the latter’s heart, that is, his internal motivation, virtue, and sense of responsibility..."
and
""It concerns the rise and the final breakthrough of a religious trend Egyptologists call “Personal Piety.”11 An individual forms a special relationship with a certain deity, which in Egyptian is paraphrased in formulas such as “putting god N into one’s heart” and “walking (or acting) on the water of god N.” This new trend finds its first expression in prayers and tomb inscriptions of the fifteenth century. The language of these texts has a long history.14 Many expressions can be traced back to the First Intermediate Period (2150–2000 BCE), where they describe the relationship of patron and client. During the Middle Kingdom (2000–1750 BCE) the ruling dynasty adopted this formula, together with its rhetoric, as a model for the new relationship between king and official, based on the latter’s heart, that is, his internal motivation, virtue, and sense of responsibility. Following the breakdown of the Amarna revolution, this attitude (loyalism) was transferred to the divine sphere, where it served to describe the relationship between god and man. Typical of the rhetoric of loyalism was the opposition between wrath and mercy, involving the formulae of “putting god into one’s heart” and “walking or acting on God’s water,” and especially the stylistic device called “macarism” or “beatitude” (“Happy the man who . . . ,” “Blessed is he who . . .”), which appears at the beginning of the book of Psalms.."
--Jan Assmann. 2008. Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel and the Rise of Monotheism. pp 76-90
Such things are no monopoly of "Eurasia ".
Note the timeline of such "axial" praxis is 2000 BC, long before any Greeks showed up. The so-called "Axial Age" that came later may have incorporated these existing elements, or have brought an acceleration of general trends, and expansion
of local variants, as part of a quickening upheaval age in Eurasia, but in
terms of self-reflection, awareness etc it can be said that the peoples of the
African Nile Valley
The "axial thing" is sometimes pitched by liberal
types as more "inclusive" history but ironically, in many respects it
seems just another version of Eurocentrism- a liberal variety this time- of
steady "transformational" progress towards a more politically correct
historical nirvana. Oh, the heroes this time might be peoples supposedly
"more in touch" with the earth, or a variety of Asiatic religions but
the bottom line is the same- a steady march of progress towards the supposedly
more enlightened (or imagined) Western present or past. Both the liberal and conservative versions stand wanting.
Axial Assets..
Rulers of Rubble- The Gaza ground invasion- Part 1
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-rulers-of-rubble-why-idf-is-not.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-rulers-of-rubble-why-idf-is-not.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2022/06/james-patterson-was-right-about-racism.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2022/06/critical-race-theory-debunked-part-2.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2022/05/critical-race-theory-debunked-white.html
The Teflon Don- Covid-era approval rating may signal November success
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-teflon-don-covid-era-approval.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-teflon-don-covid-era-approval.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2020/04/would-biden-win-be-any-big-loss-for.html
https://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2019/01/tchallas-wakanda-first-philosophy-looks.html
'AsiaRate' Lawsuit against Harvard shows dirty little secret- white quotas used at elite universities
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2018/06/asiarate-lawsuit-against-harvard-shows.html
Some gays find welcome home in the 'alt-right' as nationalist organizations step up recruitment
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2018/05/some-gays-find-welcome-home-in-alt.html
Racial discrimination is alive and kicking in employment, housing and credit markets
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2017/07/racial-discrimination-is-alive-and.html
Sowell 3- new data shows backward tropical evolution? Wealth and Poverty- An International Perspective in Trump era
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2017/07/sowell-3-new-data-shows-backward.html
Sowell 2- Wealth, Poverty and Politics- International Perspective - Trump era to bring these issues into sharper focus?
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2017/07/sowell-2-wealth-poverty-and-politics.html
Sowell- Liberal intellectuals and hard questions about race differences- Trump era may force them to focus?
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2017/07/sowell-liberal-intellectuals-and-hard.html
Trump properties discriminated against black tenants lawsuit finds
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-properties-discriminated-against.html
Stealing credibility- Dinesh D'souza has prison epiphany- after hanging with the homies- Hallelujah Hilary!
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2016/05/straining-credibility-dinesh-dsouza-has.html
Shame on you, and your guilt too- A review of Shelby Steele's 'Shame'
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2016/05/a-review-wealth-poverty-and-politics.html
Go with the flow 3- more DNA and cranial studies show ancient African migration to, or African presence in ancient Europe
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2016/04/go-with-flow-3-more-dna-and-cranial.html
Go with the flow 2- African gene flow into Europe in various eras
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/11/go-with-flow-2-african-gene-flow-into.html
DNA studies show African movement to Europe from very ancient timeshttp://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2016/04/go-with-flow-3-more-dna-and-cranial.html
Go with the flow 2- African gene flow into Europe in various eras
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/11/go-with-flow-2-african-gene-flow-into.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/09/dna-studies-show-african-movement-to.html
Guilt3- Why the "white privilege industry" is not all there
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/09/guilt3-why-white-privilege-industry-is.html
Guilt2- Media collaborates with guilt mongers - or how to play the white victim card
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/09/guilt2-media-collaborates-with-guilt.html
Hands off the Confederate flag
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/06/hands-off-confederate-flag.html
Despite much more wealth than blacks, whites collect about the same rate of welfare and are treated more generously
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/06/despite-much-more-wealth-than-blacks.html
African "boat people" ushering in European demographic decline
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/05/african-boat-people-ushering-in.html
The forgotten Holocaust- King Leopold's "Congo Free State" - 10 million victims
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-forgotten-holocaust-10-million-in.html
Are violent minorities taking over California and the West?
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/04/are-violent-minorities-taking-over.html
Presidential hopeful Ben Carson meets and Greeks
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/03/presidential-hopeful-ben-carson-meet.html
Contra "ISIS" partisans, there have been some beneficial effects of Christianity
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/03/contra-isis-partisans-there-are-some.html
The social construction of race, compared to biology- Graves
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-social-construction-of-race_8.html
Why HBD or hereditarianism lacks credibility
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/10/why-hbd-or-hereditarianism-lacks.html
Leading Scientists criticize hereditarian claims
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/08/leading-scientists-criticize.html
Thai me down - Thais fall behind genetically related southern Chinese, Tibetans below genetically related East Asians like Koreans and other Chinese
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/08/thai-me-up-thai-me-down.html
Time for liberals to respect "the south" ... in a way of speaking.. the south of Egypt that is..
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/08/time-for-liberals-to-respect-south-in.html
Irony 2: touted High IQ "G-men" cannot reproduce themselves
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/07/irony-2-higher-iqs-correlated-with_25.html
Unz and Sowell: Unz debunking Lynn's IQ and Wealth of Nations. Sowell debunking the Bell Curve
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/07/unz-and-sowell-unz-debunking-lynns-iq.html
Irony 1: touted High IQ types are more homosexual, more atheist, and more liberal (HAL)
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/06/irony-high-iqs-produce-more-atheists.html
Elite white universities discriminate against Asians using reverse "affirmative action"
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/06/elite-white-universities-discriminate.html
Deteriorating state of white America
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/05/deteriorating-state-of-white-america.html
Racial Cartels (The Affirmative Action Propaganda machine- part 2
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-affirmative-action-propaganda.html
Hereditarian's/HBD's "Great Black Hope"
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/04/blog-post.html
Exploding nonsense: the 10,000 Year Explosion
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/03/exploding-nonsense-review-of-cochran_8.html
We need "rational racism"? Proponent Dinesh D;Souza becomes his own test case
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/01/we-need-rational-racism-proponent.html
The Affirmative Action Propaganda Machine- part 1
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-affirmatve-action-propaganda.html
Two rules for being "really" black- no white wimmen, no Republican
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/01/to-be-really-black-you-cant-have-white.html
The Axial age reconsidered - or latitude not attitide
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-axial-age-reconsidered.html
Cannibal seasonings: lessons for America, or dark meat on white
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/12/i.html
"Affirmative Action" in the form of court remedies has been around a long time- since the 1930s- benefiting white union workers against discrimination by employers
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/09/affirmative-action-as-term-appears-in.html
Mugged by reality 1: White quotas, special preferences and government jobs
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/06/mugged-by-reality-1-white-quotas.html
Lightweight enforcement of EEO laws contradicts claims of "flood" of minorities "taking jobs"
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/06/blog-post.html
Railroaded 3: white violence and intimidation imposed quotas
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/06/railroaded-3-white-violence-and.html
Railroaded 2: how white quotas and special preferences blockade black progress...
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/06/railroaded-2-thow-white-quotas-and.html
Railroaded 1: How white affirmative action and white special preferences destroyed black railroad employment...
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/06/railroaded-how-white-affirmative-action.html
Affirmative action: primary beneficiaries are white women
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2011/04/affirmative-action-primary.html
7 reasons certain libertarians and right-wingers are wrong about the Civil Right Act
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2012/05/7-reasons-libertarians-may-be-wrong.html
Social philosophy of Thomas Sowell
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2011/07/social-philosophy-of-thomas-sowell.html
Bogus "biodiversity" theories of Kanazawa, Ruston, Lynn debunked
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-post_1818.html
In the Blood- debunking "HBD" and Neo-Nazi appropriation of ancient Egypt
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-post_29.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-post_29.html
early
Europeans and middle Easterners looked like Africans. Peoples returning
or "backflowing" to Africa would already be looking like Africans
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/05/blog-post_1754.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/05/blog-post_1754.html
Ancient Egypt: one of the world's most advanced civilizations- created by tropical peoples
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post_06.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post_06.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-greek-defence-review-of-thornton.html
Quotations from mainstream academic research on the Nile Valley peoples
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-post_9251.html
http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-post_9251.html
No comments:
Post a Comment